Ref. No: CBIC/33/2020 Date: 22.09.2020
To
Shri. M. Ajit Kumar,
Chairman, CBIC, New Delhi.
Sir,
Sub: Specification of duties and responsibilities of each post – reg
This Association has been, for the past several years, insisting upon the CBIC to declare the duties and responsibilities of each post in the department in each formation. This had been one of the main suggestions/demands made before the Cadre Restructuring Committee also. We had also submitted a copy of such a duty list issued in the CBDT for reference. However, the Cadre Restructuring Committee failed to prepare such a duty list for our department and we had pointed out this basic flaw in our reaction to the Draft Cadre Restructuring Proposals. We consider it as a basic flaw because, without demarcating the duties and responsibilities of each cadre in each formation, there cannot be a justification drawn for the existence of the cadres and the number of posts required in each cadre and formation.
2. The practical problem faced by our cadre is that due to the non-demarcation of such duties and responsibilities, all the responsibilities and duties are dumped on the heads of the Superintendents for the following reasons: (i) Severe vacancies in the cadre of Inspectors (ii) Available Inspectors being new to the Executive Cadre take time to learn work and by the time they learn the work they could be promoted as Superintendents (iii) All those above the rank of Superintendents, do not want to perform any original work (iv) Superintendents do not have any other assistance for their work and (v) The present day Superintendents are those who had been doing all original work when they were Inspectors and they only continue to do the same work as Superintendents and for decades now.
3. Added to the above problems, it is becoming a trend to give additional charges to the Superintendents, of other formations, works of other sections or formations and that of Administrative Officers. Effectively, our cadre is reduced to that of a Multi Tasking Force, from that of a specialised cadre for executing Law and Procedure.
4. With the level of stagnation that this cadre is facing and the assault on its dignity faced day in and day out, a great depression is setting in the minds of the cadre.
5. Apart from the demoralisation of the cadre, it is also important to note that these methods of disturbance to an organised cadre would lead to increased scope for corruption, favouritism, nepotism, uncertainty and administrative anarchy, ultimately landing the department in absolute chaos within a very short period.
6. Hence, we urge that even if the Cadre Restructuring is to get delayed, the DGHRM may be directed to immediately draw up the list of duties and responsibilities of all cadres in the department as is done in any other department under the Government.
7. Until such time, our cadre shall not be held lawfully responsible for any actions, other than that have been specified in the Act and Rules to be executed by the formations to which they are posted. Further, instructions may also kindly be issued that no additional charge for Superintendents shall be continued beyond three months and if any officer represents in writing, they shall be relieved of any additional charge(s) forthwith.
With regards,
Yours truly,
(R. Manimohan)
Secretary General
Copy for information and necessary action to:
1) The Finance Secretary, North Block, New Delhi.
2) Member (Admn & Vig), CBIC, New Delhi.
3) DG, DGHRM, CBIC, New Delhi.
4) The Commissioner (Co-Ordination), CBIC, New Delhi.
5) The Joint Secretary (Admn), CBIC, New Delhi.
(R. Manimohan)
Secretary General
I face this day in and day out. From initiating the work, executing the work and finalising the work, all is my responsibility. Inspectors have an excuse of saying I don't know and the ACs and above hardly even touch a thing, but me the superintendent is responsible for any delay or lapse in work. Can't bear this nonsense any more. I wish there were some cases of fragging in this department, then probably the higher echelons would have taken notice.
ReplyDeleteसर, ये सिचुएशन एक दिन में नहीं बनी है हमने खुद अपने आसपास एक मिथ क्रिएट कर लिया है कि हर काम के लिए सुपरिंटेंडेंट रेस्पोंसिबल है और हम हर काम की रिस्पांसिबिलिटी आगे बढ़ कर ले लेते हैं चाहे वो काम हमारा हो या न हो।
ReplyDeleteअगर सुपरिंटेंडेंट SCN का ड्राफ्ट पुट अप नहीं करें तो आईआरएस SCN इशू नहीं करेगा भले ही वह टाइम BARRED हो जाये। लेकिन क्या सुपरिंटेंडेंट ऐसा कर सकता है कि जब तक इंस्पेक्टर पुट अप नहीं करे वो SCN को आगे नहीं भेजे। सिंपल सी बात है कि सुपरिंटेंडेंट ऐसा नही करता। सवाल है क्यों, क्यों IRS ये एक्सक्यूज़ ले सकता है कि मैं क्या करता मेरे पास पुट अप ही नहीं हुआ तो फिर यही एक्सक्यूज़ सुपरिंटेंडेंट के केस में क्यों नही लागू होता।
जबाब है मेंटेलिटी, सुपरिंटेंडेंट एक ऐसा कैडर है जो स्व घोषित रूप से हर काम के लिए जबाबदेह है। ये जबाबदेही किसी ने सुपरिंटेंडेंट के ऊपर किसी और ने नहीं डाली है, सुपरिंटेंडेंट ने खुद अपने ऊपर थोपी है। इसके लिए किसी भी और कैडर की तुलना में सुपरिंटेंडेंट कैडर खुद जिम्मेदार है।
हम लोग एक बार न कहना सीख लें डिपार्टमेंट में बहुत कुछ ठीक हो जाएगा।
मुझे पूरी उम्मीद है कि नेक्स्ट 3 इयर्स में हम इस स्थिति में काफी परिवर्तन देखेंगे।
अभी डिपार्टमेंट ने e ऑफिस इम्पलीमेंट किया है एसोसिएशन को चाहिए कि एक्टिवली पार्टिसिपेट करके ये सुनिश्चित करे कि E आफिस पूरी तरह से कार्यान्वित हो और डिपार्टमेंट का इनटरनल कम्युनिकेशन e ऑफिस के माध्यम से हो। e ऑफिस के कार्यान्वन से हर एक इंडिविजुअल का रोल रिकॉर्ड पर आएगा।
ReplyDeleteOne more issue is need urgent consideration of Secretary General.
ReplyDeleteIn some cases post based role and responsibilities has already been defined but instructions are not implemented in letter and Sprit.
For Example
The DGARM vide F. No. DGARM/Tech/SOP/20/2019 dated 30th April, 2019 issued standard operating procedure for “Risky Tax Payers” and others. Action prescribed in sub-para (iii), (iv) and (v) of Para 1 of the SOP is need to be taken by the Pr. Chief Commissioner, Commissioner and the Divisional AC/DC respectively and only after that the remaining GSTIN supposed to be distributed to the Range Superintendents. However, the office of the Pr. Chief Commissioner, Commissioner and the Divisional DC/AC are distributing the GSTIN to the Range officers in mechanical manner without taking action as per SOP at their end. This will resulted in undue pressure on Range officers, large number of pendency in the DGARM and also frustrated the whole exercises of the DGARM.
If the Association brought the issue of Non-adherence of DGARM's instructions in the notice of DGARM and Board in writing, the board have no option but to issue directions for implementation. It will have great impact on more of the Cadre.
I urge the Secretary General Sir to please look into the issue.
Really Suptds works are manifold
ReplyDelete