A
meeting had been called for by the Board with both factions of AIACEGEO with Member (A) in his cabin today (12.07.2019).
Our delegation
consisting of Coms. Manimohan, Shishir, Kousik, Jithendra, Malkit & Kundu
We
have made a representation to the Member that we have submitted the
declarations of support of 24 out of 42 units and many units in UP and Gujarat
are non functional. We also showed that
we have submitted 5317 DDOs and when the Board vide its letter dated 12.2.19
has already clarified that ACs cannot be members of our Association there was
not necessity to ask us to patch up with an entity formed by an AC, with ACs,
after his promotion as AC.
Mr.
Ravi Malik and friends stated that the constitution was amended, that they had
intimated the same and therefore they were the legal entity.
We
said that the so called amendment to the constitution had not been passed as
claimed by them and the majority support shown by us will itself testify to
that fact. We also stated that if the
Board wants to assess the membership supporting us, we were prepared to change
our name and produce the DDOs in the new name and we were also prepared to
withdraw our claim if the other side was prepared to take the challenge and
change their name and get 35% membership in their new name. Mr. Ravi malik responded by saying, ‘let them
be strong, but we are only legal’.
Mr.
Venkatesh and Mr. C.S. Sharma who had also accompanied Mr. Ravi stated that
unification should be achieved by a joint convention and that Mr. Ravi will not
contest as SG. They repeatedly requested
the Member to intervene to make such a joint convention possible. Member did not get into the issue.
We
however stated that a joint convention would be possible only if the other side
was ready to accept that only elected Office bearers of Units can participate
and that ACs will not be members of the Association. Mr. Venkatesh rejected it saying that ACs
will continue as members. We said that
our units were not prepared to accept that condition.
The
Member patiently heard all arguments put forth by both sides, perused the
documents produced before him and
promised to consider the issue from all possible angles in the interest of the
cadre of Superintendents.
Good efforts but taking the things to logical end at the earliest is a must otherwise we remain stuck n ineffective as we are as on date
ReplyDeleteWhatever board decides it should be acceptable & binding to both faction.
ReplyDeleteIt is not the Board which has to decide who will represent the cadre. The members have to decide this, by democratic methods. The Board's role is limited to ensuring that the representation is as per RSA Rules.
DeleteBACK TO SQUARE ONE
ReplyDeletePlease consider the option of a joint convention in the greater interest of the Cadre.
ReplyDeleteCan the issue of membership of promotee AC be decided democratically?
Elected office bearers from supdts should continue means Manmohan & party will look after the association for smooth activities.
ReplyDeleteAny discussions regarding DPC for promotion to AC ?
ReplyDeleteजल्दी ही इस इशू पर कुछ समाधान हो जाये तो अच्छा है। सुपरिंटेंडेंट कैडर का नेतृत्व सुपरिंटेंडेंट के द्वारा ही किया जाना चाहिए।
ReplyDeleteसुपरिंटेंडेंट कैडर का नेतृत्व सुपरिंटेंडेंट के द्वारा ही किया जाना चाहिए। But people are taking stay from judicial forums to deny promotions to retiring officers, this is not in good taste. Officers are retiring every month with only one promotion in their career.
ReplyDelete