Dear
friends and comrades,
It has come to our notice that some misleading directions are
being given to the members of this Association, in the name of the Association,
by a non-member, who still claims to be the SG of this Association, even after
the clarification by the Board. It
appears that a message has been put on the blog in the following link requiring
members to send representations to the Chairman and copy marked to the Association,
for fixation of revised pay scales from 1.1.86:
We are already dealing with this
issue for fixation from 1.1.96, first, in two stages:
(1) By pursuing the
matter before the Hon’ble CAT, Mumbai, which is linked to the case of ITGOA on
the same issue pending before Hon’ble HC of Mumbai – for revision with effect
from 1.1.96
(2) Before the Anomaly committee for revision. (link for details of the submission in this
regard letter dated 7.11.2018 addressed to the Chairman is available in this
blog itself: http://cengo1.blogspot.com/2018/11/pay-anomaly-5400-paramar-and-more-on.html
)
Apart from the above, there is
also a case before the Hon’ble High Court in Orissa for effect from
1.1.86 against an adverse decision by Hon'ble CAT, Cuttak Bench. The following links also may please be verefied:
Therefore, the present attempt
is to mislead the members to give representation on a matter which is subjudice
and before the Anomaly Committee is only to give an impression that the
particular individual wanting to project himself as SG, is interested in it and
to get gullible people make representations, thus by default give him some
recognition. But, the effect of this
exercise will go against our efforts in the case.
Hence, members are requested to please be informed about the
correct status of the issue and not fall prey to gimmicks and jumlas.
R. Manimohan,
SG, AIACEGEO
This is Venkataramanan How are you.
ReplyDeleteKindly update about developments
Regarding pay parity.
What's app no 9381765318
Mail csvramanan@gmail.com
Thanks sir. Pl update the current status.
ReplyDeleteNo harm in submitting representation claiming some benefits which appears to be due.
ReplyDeleteOnly if you are in the know of the facts stated there you will know whether they are true or not. Then you will know that they are misleading. Simply if you want to send a letter stating that you should be given the higher scale from a particular date, no harm. But then it has no meaning either. If talking on legalities, it should be on proper footing, not misleading and giving half facts as if the Board is a small child and we are imbeciles.
DeleteNot having relevant materials to discuss the issue. But association is to act on the issue in right direction.
ReplyDeleteWhen the matter is subjudice as stated by Manimohan what result can we expect from the Board.
ReplyDelete