Members have been contacting from various corners seeking information regarding what happened in the meeting on 18.08.2017. In brief I can only say that the meeting took place and that the Member (Admn) heard our points, though within a stiff time frame. Since the seating within the hall was limited and 16 Associations had been invited, he had to break the meeting into two with Associations representing the Group C Non ministerial and Group C Ministerial being called in first. In the second session we participated.
We got an opportunity to explain our points in brief and Member (Admn) said that he would examine and do the needful. However, Member accepted our plea that the Board should issue instructions like the CBDT, regarding implementation of the N.R.Parmar judgement so that delay of DPC on that count could be avoided.
Further details could be deduced only once the minutes are issued.
When one of the Office bearers asked the Member (Admn) whether the meeting would be conducted periodically, he stated that it would be conducted as time would permit. However, he assured that the Commissioners and Chief Commissioners would be asked to conduct meetings with Associations regularly.
On the sidelines of the above meeting, we could form a Co-Ordination Committee of Associations in the CBIC, in which almost all Associations in CBIC have joined.
On 18.08.2017 itself a letter appears to have been issued by the Chairman wherein instead of speaking about promotions for Group B and C in the CBIC as widely expected, there was insistence on imposing 56 J on these cadres.
Did we ask for bread and get bricks instead?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave your Name, email and phone number so that we can get in touch with you for any clarification.