Dear
friends and comrades,
It is
learnt that some propaganda has been unleashed by the self-proclaimed savior of
all cadres in the dept that we have accepted the idea of Senior Superintendent
in 5400 PB-2 and that we are supporting the DR IRS and further that the IRS or
Board are involved in ‘divide and rule’.
I do
not know even if the DR IRS will really believe that we support them.
If the
powers are involved in ‘divide and rule’, it is not known why a person not able
to gather even 15% DDO strength in 2017-18 (after the convention) to lay claim
for a second association, wants to hang on at ‘any cost’ to enable such a divide and rule in utter mockery of the CCS (RSA) Rules.
Now
coming to the demand as such:
We
have actually sought 5400 PB-2 as the scale for Superintendents. It has been put forth that ‘If a cadre of Senior Superintendents is to
be created, it should be in 5400 PB-3’. The
relevant portion of the memorandum is reproduced below:
“5. Each
post should carry pay commensurate to the level of responsibilities and
comparable to that of the equivalent and similarly placed posts in other
organizations.
5.1. The Superintendents
of C.Ex & GST have to be placed in the replacement scale of Rs. 5400 in
PB-2. This will settle the anomaly viv-a-vis the Superintendents of
Posts, etc as elaborated in Annexure F. This is expenditure
neutral.
5.2. If a post of Senior
Superintendent is to be created, it may be only in the replacement scale of Rs.
5400 in PB-3. All Superintendents of C.Ex& GST currently drawing
the replacement scale of Rs. 5400 in PB-2 should be upgraded Sr.
Superintendents or as Assistant Commissioners with the scale of Rs. 5400 in
PB-3. This is also expenditure neutral and will settle the disparity between
the situation of Superintendents of GST in CBIC vis-à-vis their counterparts in
State GSTs.
5.3. In states of
Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu, the ACTOs equivalent to our Inspectors
are on the pay scale of Rs. 4800 in P.B-2. In Rajasthan, the CTOs, equivalent
to our Superintendents are on the scale of Rs. 6000, while their counterparts
in West Bengal and Maharashtra are on the scale of Rs. 5400. The equivalent
cadres in other State GSTs are also moving towards having a uniform pay
structure along with the highest in the segment. Further, in some of the states
like Telengana, all the Officers have been upgraded by one level.
5.4. Thus,
it becomes imperative to place the Inspectors on the pay scale of Rs. 4800 PB-2
and Superintendents on the pay scale of 5400 PB-3. If the pay scale
of Rs. 5400 in PB-2 is to be maintained to the Inspectors on completion of 4
years in the scale of Rs. 4800 PB-2 then it could be designated as
Superintendent and the scale of Rs. 5400 PB-3 be designated as Senior
Superintendent, in which case the scale of Assistant Commissioner shall be Rs.
6600 PB-3.”
For
the complete memorandum please go to: http://cengo1.blogspot.com/2018/08/final-proposals-of-aiacegeo.html
The
strategy behind making this demand for PB-3 would be understood by anyone who
knows the back ground and implications.
Blog is not a place to describe the same.
With fraternal
greetings,
R. Manimohan,
SG, AIACEGEO
Manimohan ji, your demand (supplimented by sub-Demand) is perfect on background of 'unending' litigations on 5400/6600(as well as GP-2&4).
ReplyDeleteSir the proposals have been submitted after circulation to our EC and after carrying out their suggestions. Thank you for the moral support.
DeleteManimohan Sir, the demand is absolutely correct n justied....Welldone.
ReplyDeleteSir, we need to be vigilant may be somebody has got the leads that board is planning this mischief and trying to portray it as your proposal. Apart from demand we have to see that board keep distance from any such proposal.
ReplyDeleteExactly, the blame game is only to create room for mischief. After all no one would ask them why they said in their proposals that Group A posts should not be increased beyond 1/3 of the existing Group A strength. It is to serve whose cause? Empty rhetoric that we are opposed to some thing will not work. Now they have been taken aback when we gave a counter proposal with justification.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSir is the so called proposed post of senior superintendent is going to be a group 1 post?
ReplyDeleteIf not, than it will no serve any purpose
5400 PB-3 is Group A
Delete