Dear friends and comrades,
In the last blog, I had given the details of the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 11.04.2019 with regard to the Bharathan (Parmar) case.
I have not been able to blog the details of proceedings of subsequent dates since I was at Delhi.
The Department side’s affidavit, as required by the Hon’ble SC on 11.04.2018 was received by us on the evening of 16.04.2018. Copy of the same is posted above.
In the hearing on 17.04.2018 mentioned before the Court that he had filed the Affidavit. Immediately the Sr. Adv representing Sh. Ravi Malik said that he was representing the Association. Our Advocate stated that he was representing the Association as R-8. The Sr. Advocate representing Bharathan & others stated that she had information contrary to what was stated in the Affidavit of the Department. The Court asked her to file affidavit on her contentions. Matter was posted to 19.04.2018 after some discussion regarding whether it should be the very next day or Friday etc.
On 18.04.2018 we filed our Affidavit in response to the Affidavit of the department. Copy of the same is also posted above.
On 19.04.2018 when the Sr. Adv of Bharathan & others rose to speak and filed her Affidavit, the Sr. Adv representing Sh. Ravi Malik again stood up and said that he was representing R-8, that people were retiring without promotions, etc. The Sr. Adv representing Bharathan & others asked him to verify the facts and stated that she was on behalf of R-1 to R-3 and not for R-8. She then went on to state that the Affidavit of the department was wrong. The Departmental Counsel stated that he required time to verify what had been stated in the Affidavit of Bharathan & Others. The Hon’ble Judge asked them whether they required time and if so he said he will not be passing any interim orders then. The Departmental Counsel sought time and accordingly it was posted for 24.04.2018.
The Affidavit filed by Sh. Rajagopal on behalf of Bharathan & others also is posted above.
Many stories have been circulating regarding to the proceedings contrary to the above facts.
I do not want to comment upon them. Members can easily see through the games, whether played by the administration or anyone else at their behest.
Fraternally yours,
R. Manimhan,
SG, AIACEGEO
Good work Sir, well done
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete